• betahack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    look…at this point I don’t know why we keep complaining about it. there are still plenty of people out there who just don’t give a fuck about physical media, price points, industry profiteering, etc. we just have to accept we don’t have the numbers to make a difference. I feel it’s an age thing for one. when I was younger I couldn’t wait for any this type of stuff. if I didn’t have money I’d bug parents for it, sell my shit or whatever to get the new hot thing…then I got older and didn’t care as much and now couldn’t give 2 fucks. I’ve become patient and wait out for cheaper pricing, better content, better reviews even though I could buy 10 of anything new that comes out…I want to make better decisions about giving money to companies that don’t exploit their people, so on but there are not enough of us to make a dent so we abide and continue to influence others to our side until we have more who believe like we do. having all these streamers review content doesn’t help. they add to the hype. for them it’s business so they pump this shit up and hype it up and people eat it up because they have the self control of a toddler, amen. touch some grass y’all and then play a little skyrim…

    • dudeface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think they care as much as you think they do, it is how the average person would have purchased the game regardless

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. The people showing their real level of intellect are the people who seem to be unable to understand the facts of the situation, think that they know better than the company who actually manufactures and sells the things, and call everyone else dumb and unintelligent for not agreeing with their factually incorrect opinion.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ah yes, one of the clearest ways to show your intelligence and how right you are is to go straight to calling people bootlickers. You sure showed me. Definitely not a sign of being more akin to a whiney child. Not at all.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re literally sucking boot for toxic corporate practices, what else do you call that if not a bootlicking?

              Enjoy your slop.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          think that they know better than the company who actually manufactures and sells the things,

          Do you think corporations have your best interest in mind? The company who makes and sells GTA wants to make money. That’s it. That’s the sum total of their intent.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            No, absolutely not, and I didn’t even hint at that.

            I’m saying that Sony know the exact number of physical games that are printed and sold vs the number of digital games. They know that it’s 10:1 in favour of digital. That’s why they’re doing this. It’s best for their bottom line.

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    GTA5 was out for like three years on PC before I bothered with it. I found it to be… fairly mediocre. There’s nothing in GTA6 that would make me feel otherwise. I’ll eventually play it… at great discount, or not at all.

    • BewareOfIdiot@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I genuinely don’t understand the hype. Maybe I’m just old and fully saturated with GTA already.

      • SiegeRhino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        nothing special but rabid fans and worth a billion dollars, it’s the Taylor Swift of video game franchises

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s like people with windows computers who complain about Apple

        Some people don’t understand the difference in quality as they lack taste

        • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Apple does some things well, Windows does some different things well, and increasingly, for the everyday users who mostly thought those were the only two choices, Linux does some things well.

          It’s all about what you, the user, care about.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Are we at the anti-rockstar coping phase where we pretend that most of their games are trash already? 🤣

        GTA3 was revolutionary and legit one of the most important, best games of all time. Vice city was arguably even better of a game. 5 is just an insane open world, the likes which we’ve never seen in a game.

        Now I say this as someone who has no interest in GTA6, got a free copy of GTA5 on 360 and sold it unopened, and hated GTA4, so don’t assume I’m some GTA fanboy.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Watched a video recently about how they engineered GTA3 to load this impression of an enormous city on the PS2’s miniscule amount of RAM. He showed how the city loads and unloads itself around the player, which was crazy genius for the time.

          He also explains how because of those memory limitations, you could end up going to grab a sweet sports car and would suddenly find everyone else was driving one too lol.

          It was by Game Maker’s Toolkit. https://youtu.be/cIbCxbrBCys?is=EtKDSUr8BcpU8tuK

          I love stories like this and I’m not even big on GTA. I sure did like Saint’s Row 3 and 4 though. XD

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well that’s a crazy take, you can just say you don’t like the Rockstar narrative open-world shooter style.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So I was watching JoeFromSeattle and he basically has an observation/theory from repeatedly interacting with these people on Twitter.

    … They literally do not count themselves as ‘gamers’, they use the word to identify others.

    These are the people who buy Madden/FIFA every year, every COD, every Battlefield, and assume everyone does that, to the point of projecting it without realizing it and then not believing you if you say you didn’t do that as well.

    … they are very often illiterate, cannot understand sentences above roughly Grade 5 complexity, always assume they are correct and work backwards to attempt to form a justification for whatever they’ve decided is corrrect.

    … they’re morons.

    Like just… complete fucking morons.

    And that’s not an insult, its simply accurate.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m sorry but if you’re not playing at least one of those games every year, you are the minority. Those people who constantly buy and play games are more of a “gamer” than a judgemental arse like yourself. Those games you criticise are by FAR the most played and bought games every year, played by tens of millions of people - the majority of gamers.

      People like you give “gamers” a bad name.

      • feetandballs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t understand why people are piling on and blocking you. The comment you’re replying to is whiny gatekeeping with a name-calling bow on top. They accuse this group of excluding themselves from “gamers” while calling them stupid and criticizing the way they entertain themselves. I don’t know that I’d want to be in a group that talks about me like that, either.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        How are they giving gamers a bad name? Even assuming they’re wrong, how does that work? They give gamers a bad name because they got a statistic wrong? Makes no fucking sense.

        • feetandballs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re gatekeeping gaming and calling people who don’t interact with games the way they do morons. It’s childish and, whether it’s wrong or not, rude. The upvotes are what gives gamers a bad name, though, not his statement.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They just called the MAJORITY of the video game buying population “fucking morons”, and “nOt ReAl GaMeRs” because they have a different opinion to them, even though that opinion is the overwhelmingly popular opinion.

          You don’t see how that gives “gamers” a bad name? Gatekeeping “gamers” to the tiny minority of people who buy physical games, don’t buy the biggest and most played games, and calling everyone else a fucking moron?

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ahahah!

            No, no… you can’t read that well, can you?

            Try again buddy, go … slower this time, understand how qualified statements work, and keep in mind the entire context of what I said.

            You’ve concluded that I said a whole bunch of things that I did not say.

            Apparently I’ve triggered you quite seriously… I wasn’t intending to, but uh… yeah, try again, try to read the words that I actually said.

            • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If your first rebuttal has you calling someone “triggered”, while offering no counter points, it’s safe to say you have already lost.