Peacepath

easy way to solve all problems (while not resolving any)

Can you guess why some want to live near there work and their kids’ school rather than in the middle of nowhere?

The one-true-and-perfectly-good has tried to genocide all form of life by drawning them under rain (fishes got very affraid)… but so yes, you won’t get in his club without at least trying to be a bit as him…

It seems it was so common, at that time and this place to publicly claim religious things, that it is quite unlikely there is not at least one guy that matches less or more the one of the texts… texts which are written far after…

Anyway, the author isn’t the main character. The writers wrote texts, but the author who foundate the religion by making the bible as it is, is the one who collected texts, selected some, decided the order, and supervised the translation. Who is it?

The smell plays a role in attraction. Fertility surely plays a role too, for heterosexual relationships… yet I guess the compatibility of immune system should still play a role in homosexual relationships and between people who aren’t fertile (due to age or health conditions) since it is not conscious, no? Do you know if it has been studied too?

That is metaphoric, and they often say that before any kiss happend… and if they kiss while “there is no chemistry” they aren’t much of romantics…

Have you ever kissed someone you loved and found out from that kiss that youwere not compatible with that persone? I have know a few kissers, but I haven’t heared of that among my friends or relatives…

I don’t sample anything when I kiss, so I don’t know… for me it is more a moment of exchange with an other persone and that mater is more in the sentimental feelings and complicity.

A same persone kiss doesn’t “taste” the same according to what they ate just before. Yet may the compatibility of a persone doesn’t depend on the last thing they ate?

Are we human able to feel pheromones? Or do they date other species?

Else, well, if they smell on a daily basis, some honnesty on the first date is not wrong, I guess…

I agree with you, and from my understanding (which could be inaccurate) the position of debian is to avoid a part of the use of that technology they judge both wrong and avoidable.

My own nasty use of AI is mostly to find back the name or syntaxe of functions I seldom use, and sometimes to explain me some theorical points. I admit it is wrong and only spares me only a few hours a week at most compared to stack overflow and online tutorials.

And my laziness would probably make me accept the existance of one model that would be a public property democraticaly controled ; which would consume less ressources than having many concurrents, and avoid the profit-oriented and corporate mindsets (I imagine them being the main source of threat)…

Also, a ban without control isn’t a ban. And making sure that not a single line of code was writen with the help of some AI seems more than complicated… is it just possible?

And how much working time would it take to audit all packages to make sure it is 100% wrote by some human?

It seems more realistic (and more honnest) to allow the part that would not be found by a reasonable audit of the code.

Do you feel like the civilization you live in as a positive effect to prevent this crisis?

If the civilization I live in collapse, that would be an harsh chaos for us, but for climate and therefore future generations I really think it would be a positive event…

We have far less fears to see our civilzations collapse than we had at that time… Isn’t it kind of positive to have some hopes?

Now that you say it, it truely works. And look, for tabaco, before the poors were smoking and dieing of the consequences of it while evil rich were getting rich by selling them poison. And so it was the richs’fault!

Thanks to taxes, poors keep smoking and they still die of it, and rich seller still make money out of it. But now the fault is on the poors who are smokers…

Also, I would like to suggest heavy high taxe on sugar and sweet products so that blackmarket could keep growing. And since we now buy cigarets from illegal drug dealers, why not also buy from them our candies and sodas? It gives back some money to (the richest one of the) poor neighbohoods without direct intervention in the economy.

Education and program for healthy behaviour accessible even for poors would be so wrong: the richest would make less money and pass for the bad guys…

It is a good way to tax the poors while pretending it is ethical and for public health… May the poors would be healthier if they have less money?

It sounds to me as a failure for the education system. They probably didn’t deserve to die of believing in lies they could have rejected if they had received a good education in terms of critical thinking…

I want one like that! Where may I buy it?