• 0 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle







  • Except it’s not rational.
    Countries with socialized health care systems do have abusers, but they are a tiny minority of the population, because most people don’t want to spend their life in hospitals.
    Roads are socialized everywhere but you don’t see many people just driving around to make sure they get their “fair share” of road using/wearing out of their taxes.

    Depending what we talk about, overusing resources does not translate in increased comfort or quality of life.


  • In France, already 10% of the population depends on food-banks. In 2023, the largest non-profit providing meals and distributing food sent a distress call saying they were close to bankrupcy as the number of people in need is going up fast while donors have less and less to give being themselves crunched.

    France’s richest family, the Arnault, largely responsible for turbo-charging the trickle up trend in the country by buying political influence, rescued them by making a big donation.

    The leader of the non-profit, who had been vocal about impoverishment of the population and growing inequalities because of the oligarchs, cannot say anything anymore: now he can’t keep going without these oligarchs good will.

    That’s the plan. It’s being executed right in front of us, in the open.


  • Absolutely, but that’s not something you fix at company level.

    Am I the only one old enough to remember when we still had homemade products competing with chinese cheap products on the shelves? Consumers picked the Chinese version over and over, until the local plant shut down (or was delocalized in China…).

    You could have had exactly the same speech about CEOs at the time: if your market is western consumers (at the time, China was not yet rich enough to have a significant local demand), who are you going to sell to when everyone has lost their job because of delocalization?

    Answer is indeed: that’s not my problem to solve. It’s a systematic issue, it should be addressed through regulation.

    CEO’s job is not to address that, it’s too maximize values for shareholders. If laying off everyone and use AI does that, then executing is just them doing their job right. If regulation bans or adds a high enough penalty on such a move, they won’t do it.





  • matlag@sh.itjust.worksto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Have the gov and most parties announce they switch to Bluesky and/or the Fediverse, and suddenly journalists will talk about it, and many more people will hear of it.

    Note: far-right parties will tend to stick on X, because algos favor them, and that’s where their audience is. If they don’t switch, I won’t complain…




  • Oh they now pretty much agree climate change is real and human-made. There are a few exceptions including a prominent one glorifying ignorance and stupidity, that embeds anti-sciencism, but overall, leaders agree on the issue.

    The proplem is they also agree on not doing too much about it, because acting could be bad for next quarter’s economy, and of course “I’m not doing anything until everyone else is doing something”, summarized as “collective suicide pact” by Antonio Guterres. But what did he know, only the Secretary General of the UN?