Could be even less lethal to not have gloves at all. Kids aren’t bears, and it’s pretty terrible to compare children to wild animals.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
- GalacticRobot@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world•Nebraska's largest school district asks police to stop using electric shock gloves on students1·1 day ago
- GalacticRobot@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world•Nebraska's largest school district asks police to stop using electric shock gloves on students1·1 day ago
Nah, no gloves at all is even better.
- GalacticRobot@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world•Nebraska's largest school district asks police to stop using electric shock gloves on students42·1 day ago
Not sure why police are needed at schools at all. I can’t think of many European schools that have armed officers at schools and they seem to have a whole lot less issues than US schools soooo.
- GalacticRobot@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world•Nebraska's largest school district asks police to stop using electric shock gloves on students31·1 day ago
Welcome to America. ICE just signed a multiple million dollar contract to get these to use on ‘illegal immigrants’. US tax dollars hard at work here.
Median square foot is close to the same. It’s cheaper to build larger than smaller in the US because of the space for expansion and developers aren’t being forced to pay for services needed when they expand suburban areas.
Or perhaps consumerism should lay off. Wealth doesn’t happen when people don’t buy things they don’t need.
which is why a single blue collar salary that used to be enough for a good house, a car and the expenses for a family of 5 in the 60s, now can barelly pay the rent of small appartment in a major city.
Except this isn’t remotely true. For American’s you had the 62% home ownership in 1960’s for much smaller homes (on average 700 sqft) vs 65% now for an average of 2000sqft. The average American family in 1960 owned 1 vehicle, they now own 2. They went on less vacations, moms typically had to work on top of taking care of the family (little to no daycare), oh and interest rates were much higher as well (on top of that pesky women couldn’t even own a home by themselves). Single person living was roughly 10% vs 30% now, oh and those hard working dads often didn’t live by a year past retirement. And if you were a minority? You absolutely were f’ed.
Yes, costs are higher now relative to income, but demands also are. Want cheap, you move out to rural areas, but risk you don’t have work. The same problem that has been endemic in the US since it’s inception.
Correct. It’s trying to work around censors when there shouldn’t be any at all, and everyone should actively be rebelling against censorship.