I mean, I guess “impeccable safety record” is in the eye of the beholder?

  • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The human safety supervisor of a Tesla Robotaxi who crashed was apparently sleep deprived and having a mental health episode, so, if you think self-driving cars will insulate you from human foibles, just you wait. The futures going to get real weird!

    Broadly I agree, though. The goal is better-than-human. It really shouldn’t ever cross a solid line, though.

    That was this case, it’s all self-reported so take it with a grain of salt, but it was interesting food for thought: https://electrek.co/2026/07/28/tesla-self-driving-manager-rolling-hazards-lawsuit/

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The goal is better-than-human. It really shouldn’t ever cross a solid line, though.

      The goal should be far fewer cars of any sort on the street. Investing in self driving cars instead of better infrastructure is stupid. Especially when the cars are privately owned

      • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A non-existent car is ALSO safer than a human-driven car, so it’ll sound weird coming from an automotive journalist, but I totally agree. There’s no car safer than a railway car.