Safer for pedestrians, in the nihilistic sense that they at least won’t survive the hit I guess?

  • inmate_p01135809@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My parents hit a deer at 40mph with their Forester and it turned into pink mist. The only “mass” left of it was just a head. I have no doubt the CT is not as safe as regular vehicles, but I don’t think the outcome of object getting hit by something at 75mph is going to be an indicator of safety.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      Yeah, I’d assume that a 75mph impact between human/deer and a vehicle is going to go badly regardless.

      There is a lot of evidence that a low front with a significant upward slope (where a struck pedestrian is pushed up over the vehicle) is much safer for pedestrian collisions, but for quite awhile now the style has been flat or aggressive grills. Far from just the cyber truck that’s guilty of this

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Very safe for pedestrians where I live as no one in their right mind would even consider imagining thinking about buying one even if they weren’t banned and didn’t look like a wheeled skip, therefore no pedestrians are at risk.