• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 24th, 2025

help-circle

  • It is a totally ambiguous example. The US under Truman partnered with the Vatican to save almost 10k Nazis from trial and spread them all over the US sphere of influence with protection, money, jobs, property, etc. and then it immediately took over imperial Japan’s holding of Korea, established a fascist military dictatorship, and killed a million civilians in the North. Around the same time it protected the KMT in the province of Taiwan during the White Terror wherein the KMT established a fascist government that killed tens of thousands of civilians for political control.

    It’s completely ambiguous whether or not the US was fighting for freedom or liberty.



  • freagle@lemmy.mltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldSpace Nazi Says "Nuh-Uh!"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They were 45 years after Operation Overcast and 30 years after Operation Paperclip officially ended. Which means Nazis got to regroup after having been defeated and cast into disarray by the USSR and spend 3 generations developing their program under the protection of the US military with the resources of the US economy.


  • freagle@lemmy.mltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldSpace Nazi Says "Nuh-Uh!"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Uh, there wasn’t a lack of Nazis in '90s. The US, under Truman, partnered with the Vatican to save over 10,000 Nazis from justice and brought them to the US, its territories, and its vassal states. It gave them fake names and official documents, money, jobs, property, and protection. Then the US staffed the first generation of NATO with Nazi officers, and together they organized Nazis and Nazi collaborators all over Europe in a covert operation to arm, fund, train, and prepare them for a resurgence. In West Germany, former Nazi politicians were openly elected and appointed into government positions, and it was so egregious that some Germans and Scandinavians turned to terrorism in protest. The USSR had to build a wall completely around West Berlin because it was a small little polity in the middle of East Germany that was literally electing Nazis to power.







  • Fighting border disputes is not imperialism. Since 1992 Russia has engaged in military conflict almost exclusively with its neighbors (totalling about 5 countries depending on how you count conflicts) and has not ever taken over any of its neighbors through these conflicts and managed their economic affairs to Russia’s benefits.

    By comparison, the US has engaged in military conflict with none of its neighbors, and yet in the same 34-year span has engaged in military conflict with 12 - 15 countries depending on how you count military conflicts. And the objectives were either total domination and economic extraction, total economic devastation of countries operating outside their economic control, or disruption and elimination of resistance to their control. In most cases, the US took over hugely profitable economic operations like mining and opium farming or destroyed competitive economic operations like oil and gas and food production that directly competed with US corporations.

    One of these is imperialism. One of these is the border disputes arising from being the target of Western dominance-oriented aggression for 175 years.


  • Voter: That guy’s got a knife and he’s coming for me! What do I do?

    D: Vote for me and I’ll keep you safe!

    Voter: OK! Here I go… let’s… voooooooote!

    D: I win the election, thanks to everyone who donated to my campaign. This is a win for all of us, not just me.

    Voter: Ok, now take that guy’s knife away.

    D: <slaps voter> How dare you criticize me after my very tenuous and delicate victory!

    Voter: But he still has the knife and he’s still coming for me.

    D: Donate $25 to my campaign for re-election and we’ll stop the knife wielding maniacs!

    Voter: But you won already. Are you going to stop the knife wielding maniacs?

    D: We can’t unless you vote D in the next election.

    Voter: But I voted D in this one, and you won, and he still has a knife

    R: Haha! I have won the next election. Here I come with my knife that no one took from me!

    D: How would we have lost?! It must be the voters’ fault! Donate $25 to my campaign and we’ll send out weird postcards saying that we’ll know if you voted or not

    Voter: Well, getting slapped is not as bad as getting stabbed!