What effects do the judges opinions actual have? Is it literally just like a news paper opinion columm - formal soap box, or does the opinion actually change how things are done and have tangible impacts for how governance is actioned?

Are there any examples of what kind of power and infpuence a clerk wields in the scotus?

Like, what kind of actions are clerks able to do - assuming the sc judge gives a long leash?

I dont have much insight at all into the justice systems sausage making process

Ok, so the basic gist im getting is that he begged sk to help save him from his iran quagmire, and when they rejected he said “ok fu” and took strategic resources (includong air craft carrier) out of the region, which finally reduced the pressure enough to sk to finally request peace from nk without daddy US butting in?

Trump got mad at being rejected, and tried to threaten imperilment, but instead it got nuetralized by peace because the us was holding up nk/sk tensions, especially in the latest while?

If so, this should be the strongest evidence for the technique of dealing with us foriegn deplomacy, just turn the chud down and he’ll just give you your soverignty back.

Just stand up to the pretensious bully

Thats so cool, i wonder how it plays with candle/lantern/sun lights