-credit to nedroid for strange art

  • 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • Late night fever dream.

    BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

    1. No person shall be eligible for the highest office of <nation>, nor of their highest houses (‘Congress’, ‘Senate’, ‘Parliament’, or equivalent ruling body) unless they have at least one child of age eligible to serve active duty in their military at the time of attaining office, or are themselves eligible for active duty;

    2. <Nation>, upon entering a state of War, declared or undeclared, incursion, ‘liberation mission’, ‘limited operation’, or any other such terms causing military operation against another nation, triggers a mandatory enlistment and deployment of ALL politicians enacting said state of conflict, and their eligible children. This shall apply to the highest and second-highest leadership, as well as those of their highest houses; for service to enter active duty immediately, to be placed on the first offensive line, and remaining on active lines of conflict until their tour of duty is fully served, or their death, whichever occurs first;

    3. If the opposing nation does not have this same policy in effect, the first and foremost objective of <nation>, being in conflict with demonstrated cowards, shall be to eliminate the children of opposing cowardly nation’s leadership, followed by the cowardly leaders themselves;

    4. The preceding clauses logically imply that any opposing nation should carefully consider if they are to engage in unprompted aggression against our great <nation>, and are strongly encouraged to adopt this same statute for the protection of their own leaders and their families.






  • Arghblarg@lemmy.catome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I didn’t say it was anyone’s objective to be attractive to me. And it isn’t. I just have (as does everyone else) the agency to decide for myself what I find attractive or not.

    Thank you for pointing out the possibly ambiguity of my response though, so I could clarify.