• SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    it’s relatively stable until it isn’t. If you don’t have time to fuck around, use mint.

    Elaborate please. I’m weighing installing Fedora for KDE. What kind of fucking around should I expect?

    • chunk6235@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you’ve got a gaming GPU, bazzite is built on kde fedora and takes away 99% of the problems I had with the old school distro. It’s an atomic distro so you can’t fuck up the base is nearly as easily.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, I’ve got an ancient machine with too little memory. However, you reminded me that I might want to look into NixOS just to check out how it works, for better or worse.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fedora is a very early adopter of new technologies, often even earlier than Arch. They were the first to adopt PulseAudio, the first to use Wayland sessions by default, the first to drop Xorg, and will likely be the first to drop lib32 packages. Any issues that may arise from major upgrades or changes, you are most likely to be exposed to them on Fedora.

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh it’s kinda fine most of the time. But if you really don’t have time to fix dependencies (via dnf) and constantly leave it for later, many broken things accumulate. It’s usually fine (and usually works for at least a few years without problems, even on arch).

      Edit: also the other comments.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Thanks again for the info. However, I can’t remember when I ever had to ‘fix dependency problems’ with APT. Maybe when I ran Debian Testing for a while, or if I added one too many external repos, or if I really really wanted to run two explicitly conflicting packages — but still it’s such a foreign thing that I can’t recall if it actually ever occurred. Apparently APT’s reputation for most solid dependency resolution among package managers is quite well deserved.

          • Jade@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            The worst I’ve ever had happen could be fixed with the (prompted) --allow-erasing flag, and I messed around with additional repositories a lot

            • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              messaged around with additional repositories a lot

              Gotta say again, as an APT user, I have no idea what “messaged around with additional repositories” means.

                  • Jade@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    As an APT user I’m sure you’ve also used PPAs and third party repositories for additional software and drivers? Pretty sure Ubuntu likes to add some by itself.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just use the kiddy distro. We don’t have time for your questions! 🧐

      Also there are probably thirty actual decent KDE distributions. OpenSuSE is one of the very old ones, there are many others.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That is an amazing non-answer. Very impressive in its uselessness. Good job.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Uh-huh. And how long do I need to run the VM before I run into an ‘isn’t stable’ situation? Half a year, a year, more? Am I supposed to use the VM as my main machine during that time?

        • katze@lemmy.4d2.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Just install it, try to install KDE (Gnome is the main desktop of Fedora), see if it works, if you like it, and if you can tolerate the slow ass package manager that is yum.

          Should take you about 30 minutes; no need to be rude about it.

          You can even try it in your browser if you think setting up a VM is too much time wasted: https://distrosea.com/de/start/fedora-44-kde/

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Come on man. I know what KDE looks like. Running a VM for a bit won’t help me learn what issues occur with Fedora sometimes.