ppl trying to defend LLMs as if the only problem with “gen” AI is who it benefits under the inherently- erm- capitalistic nature of capitalism lol Its tiring.
ppl trying to defend LLMs as if the only problem with “gen” AI is who it benefits under the inherently- erm- capitalistic nature of capitalism lol Its tiring.
Slippery slope fallacy. Some tools are inherently wrong to use. Since we’re talking about weapons of war, you could never make this argument about napalm, for instance. The flaws of LLMs are inherent to them and can’t be painted over, no matter how perfect the paint or how well intentioned the painter.
I don’t think napalm itself is fascist but it can be used in a fascist way.
If we want to apply the fascist argument here as well, yes, I think napalm could only benefit a cause that, if nothing else, lends itself to fascism. However, putting that aside, there’s no good use case for napalm in general. I can’t believe I keep trying to re-word and explain that tools made for/inherently tied to suppressing or devaluing people and art are fascist, and it goes nowhere.