I have a '79 corvette with <90k miles. I love it, but I don’t drive it. I would like to sell it, ideally to someone else who will both love and drive it. I don’t want to use Facebook and I live in a rural area. Is there another good option?

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        When I opened the post and saw the year/mileage I was surprised. 90k for a '79 would definitely be considered low mileage. I know corvettes are a stereotypical “garage kept, barely driven” car, so I’m sure most are under the average usage, but even if the car was driven 1/3 as much as the average car it would have over twice the miles (assuming it still ran.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m sure most are under the average usage, but even if the car was driven 1/3 as much as the average car it would have over twice the miles.

          Not for older cars. Most cars from the 70s would be retired or require a major overhaul by 100k miles.

          New cars just last soo much longer than they used to. That’s a major reason when I was younger Japanese cars started to eat American car manufacturers’ market share. Seeing a Nissan maxima last 150k miles without needing any work just spoke for itself when you were used to buying a new car every 3-4 years.

          • papalonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Edited my comment. I didn’t mean to say, “the average car from '79 would have x miles on it” (if a car that old managed to survive this long while being daily driven it would have well over 500k), so much as I was highlighting how impressive it was the car was still at such low mileage despite (presumably) still running and being driven occasionally.

            I suppose “low mileage” is subjective. It’s got less than 1/5 the miles it “should” based on age, but it also probably has less than 1/5 of it’s remaining mileage left before something goes bang (unless work has already been done on it).

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Yeah, it’s a bit of a survivor ship bias, most of the cars from the 70s that are still surviving have even lower mileage on them. A lot of classic cars that are still around were ones that people put in barns after driving them 20k-30k miles. Most of the ones that were actually driven around and used died a long time ago.

              A lot of those low milage classics are basically just show cars, where the owners cart them around in trailers so they can keep the milage low.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      How is it not for a 57 year old car? Not even 2k a year…

      That’s what I put on my 206 (that had already quite a bit more on it) on 7 years, including 2020 (Covid) when I barely drove it. I bought a used 2015 car last year with 75k miles, and I consider that ‘almost brand new’. Both with 1.6L 4 cylinder engines, quite smaller than the beast op is talking about that must have a 5-6 litres v8 at least…

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s all relative, most cars from +50 years ago were lucky to make it a 100k miles before needing a major overhaul or just giving out completely. Even in the 80s the average person would be buying a new car every 3-4 years.