DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca to Political Memes@lemmy.ca · 2 days agoMiladin didn't read the spoilers!imagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down16cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageMiladin didn't read the spoilers!DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca to Political Memes@lemmy.ca · 2 days agomessage-square29linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoThere are a few differences
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoAccuracy, for starters. Rate of fire is another big one. Killing someone with a single sling stone is significantly more impressive than with a pistol. Re: @mobyduck648@lemmy.world The lesson I think is less ‘the weak can defeat the strong’ in general and ‘don’t engage your enemy on his terms, engage him where you are strongest’. David wasn’t the only Jewish soldier with access to sling stone technology. I think the moral of David v Goliath is supposed to be “corporal strength is no match for divine providence” If David had missed, nobody would be talking about him - except, perhaps, as a cautionary tale about hubris.
There are a few differences
Really? Like what?
Accuracy, for starters.
Rate of fire is another big one.
Killing someone with a single sling stone is significantly more impressive than with a pistol.
Re: @mobyduck648@lemmy.world
David wasn’t the only Jewish soldier with access to sling stone technology.
I think the moral of David v Goliath is supposed to be “corporal strength is no match for divine providence”
If David had missed, nobody would be talking about him - except, perhaps, as a cautionary tale about hubris.