• SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And this Goliath is 6 foot 3, 235 pounds with 5% body fat. Honest 🤞

    Its totally not a 5 foot 8, 300 pound tub of lard and spray tan wearing a diaper.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve never really heard anyone pronounce it like aboot (as in "rain boots). More like abeut (as in beutiful) or abowt (as in ‘bow down’). Is it because I’m from Ontario?

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve got a theory about that. As someone from the US, I’ve tried pronouncing “about” the way people from Ontario do… and it’s really hard. It’s a sound we just don’t make in our accent. Which is why I suspect that so many Americans say that you say “aboot” - not because you literally say “aboot,” but because it’s the closest approximation many of us can make to your pronunciation.

        In other words, it’s a skill issue on our part.

      • lividweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can’t speak for others, but out here on the west coast, I say it more like “a-bow-oot”. I could then see how it morphs into the stereotypical “a-boot”.

      • DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a west coaster, I assumed it is, like most of the dumber stereotypes, a Quebec/maritimes thing.

        Other than bagged milk, which I know is your fault.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand how we were treating the US unfairly by selling commodities the US upsold and exported while watching our own defence and manufacturing industries wither and die.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 day ago

      We’re not. They’re just taking a tantrum because we don’t bend at the knee for Sir Shitsalot.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      He doesn’t care about facts. He thinks in stereotypes and assumes Canada is a bunch of ope pushovers. He’ll find out.

  • dermanus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s no will to fight Canada in the US. No one can articulate what the actual goal is, beyond vague unfairness. Meanwhile, the Canadian government here has ~75% cross partisan support for walking away from the table.

    Or to put it in words MAGA might understand: it ain’t the size of the dog in the fight, it’s the size of the fight in the dog.

    • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Obligatory reminder that a sling was actually pretty much a gun of its time, easily capable of killing a guy.

      • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah the David vs Goliath fight is a lot less one-sided when you remember David was a shepherd and a dab hand with a slingshot, he’d have been using it to defend his flock from predators from childhood and ancient armies fielded them as weapons of war. The man basically took a gun to a sword fight.

        The lesson I think is less ‘the weak can defeat the strong’ in general and ‘don’t engage your enemy on his terms, engage him where you are strongest’.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Accuracy, for starters.

            Rate of fire is another big one.

            Killing someone with a single sling stone is significantly more impressive than with a pistol.

            Re: @mobyduck648@lemmy.world

            The lesson I think is less ‘the weak can defeat the strong’ in general and ‘don’t engage your enemy on his terms, engage him where you are strongest’.

            David wasn’t the only Jewish soldier with access to sling stone technology.

            I think the moral of David v Goliath is supposed to be “corporal strength is no match for divine providence”

            If David had missed, nobody would be talking about him - except, perhaps, as a cautionary tale about hubris.