• CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        One head-type-thing and four limb-type-things, with only two being primarily locomotive, makes that more humanoid than not on an intergalactic body plan scale.

        We are very bad at thinking up truly alien life.

            • Llamatron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’ve never understood this phrase. How does an exception prove a rule? Surely an exception disproves a rule?

                • Korval@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  When enough people know a saying, but don’t understand its intent, its meaning drifts. The idea is supposed to be that the existence of an exception proves that there is a rule, with “rule” being in the sense of a generality.

                  I learned that from the Grammar Girl podcast and found it interesting enough that it stuck with me (because it was something I’d long wondered). Her example is a sign that forbids skateboarding while school is in session. “You can infer that you are allowed to skateboard at other times. The rule that the exception proves is that skateboarding is generally allowed. If that were not a rule, why would exceptions be made at all?"

                  Transcript: https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/qdtarchive/why-do-we-say-the-exception-that-proves-the-rule/