• savvie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “We just saw democracy in America in action. We should bring a little more democracy to the United States Senate,” [Maryland Senator Chris] Van Hollen continued. “We have two newly-elected senators who would not be there if Schumer and the [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee] had their way.”

    Van Hollen then drew a line in the sand, arguing that Schumer and the DSCC had “sided with the crypto industry” and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, better known by the acronym AIPAC.

    A wave of Democratic voices have been opposing Schumer’s leadership and establishment politics since the party won the majority in Congress in last week’s elections.

    • BooBees@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep. Schumer has been calling these candidates and their supporters a minority voice, but those voices were overwhelming majorities this election, so let’s take a vote on the next leaders of the Democratic Party. Get rid of the good old boys policy of seniority. It’s anti-democratic, it’s anti-change.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I was torn before because you do want someone in there that knows how to get the votes and handle getting things done, but he has proven that he’s for himself first. We’ll figure it out with a new person.

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Pretty much this. He is a good politician when we strictly measure his ability to negotiate and secure votes. However, that doesn’t matter when he’s negotiating and securing those votes from a place of bad faith, because it is abundantly clear that his focus is on Israel first.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        By what metric are you judging his ability to get votes? Seems to me Democrats have struggled to get any kind of legislation through the Senate for years which I think indicates that he’s not very good at getting votes.

        • Manjushri@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Exactly. The only votes Schumer is good at getting is getting moderate dems to vote with the republicans.

      • 2ndDegreeOWO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And I suspect his lauded ability to ‘secure votes’ is deeply connected to AIPAC’s lobbying. When he needs to secure a vote, he just calls up his Israeli buddies and has them apply pressure.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Van Hollen isn’t new, he’s been in the Senate for 10 years and has served as chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. He knows what’s up

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That article is about this House. We’re talking about the Senate. Electing a House Speaker required a simple majority of all members. Given Democrats’ sizeable majority, this means probably 50 Representatives would have to withhold support from Jeffries. This may happen or may not. Fortunately, in the House there are mechanisms for membership to bring bills to the floor regardless of the Speaker’s wishes.

      In the Senate, I think enough Democratic Senators are on board for a change from Schumer, which will force a competitive election for Majority Leader. This position has more control of the legislative agenda than the House Speaker does

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            So you think the same party that’s threatening reps for control of the house simply won’t organize to the same level in the Senate, the much more powerful body of government? Explain why to me the Senate is gonna be a free and fair race from the same party willing to threaten reps over the house.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Kick his ass to the curb. Let him leave with dignity if he chooses to listen. Shove him out the door if he refuses.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Have Liberals finally realized that capitulating to those openly and aggressively hostile to Liberalism is like the stupidest fucking thing ever?

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In a feat of unparalleled mental athleticism, they’ve managed to avoid learning any correct lesson for a solid decade now

      But they’re looking tied out there Jim. Who knows how much longer they can keep up this incredible performance