• Bubs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    From what I read on a Twitter thread giving updates on the movie, the total budget was about $5000 (production + whatever was needed to publish it). The latest prediction from the box office was about $30,000,000 in revenue by the end of the movie’s running.

  • Visstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have a feeling this is just gonna cause a bunch of shitty movies getting made.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You say that like this is the first movie that gained a following because it was so bad it overflowed to being good. But that’s a hard line to walk deliberately without drifting into satire territory (which is just making fun of something else by mimicking it) or self-parody (making fun of yourself), which are different because the makers are in on the joke. “So bad it’s good” only works when they aren’t in on the joke because part of the humour is that someone genuinely thought it was good. It *can" be faked, but it’s difficult since most makers want to be in on the joke rather than the butt of it and won’t be able to help giving little winks to the audience that ruin it. Or they don’t know how to be entertainingly bad and just make something that isn’t interesting.

      • Visstix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I am not saying it is the first of it’s kind, but it is one of the most successful ones. And I am saying that people will try to force a replica of this success with absolute trash.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      good

      flood the entire movie industry with garbage because those billionaires already make nothing but garbage as it is

      I’d rather give money to someone’s mom for trash, then those fucking worthless fucks they call ceos and shareholders

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same reason why the Killer Bean movie is surprisingly watchable. You think you’re just going to just watch a bad movie, but the amateur skill and heart on display trumps Hollywood 4x

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The bad films of now aren’t actively trying to be purposefully bad. The new wave will be purposefully terrible movies, with each decision being calculated rather than being organically terrible.

        Kinda like a little kid drawing something compared to a fully grown adult professional artist trying to emulate the drawing.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where have you been the past ten years with reboots and sequels? The only difference here is budget.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I despise CGI in films, but would be more interested in watching this than another Hollywood “blockbuster”

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      from what I’ve read about it: No its not AI - it took years to make using Sketchup + Blender. Kid had an idea, mother had means to make it happen and a connection in the industry to get it into some theaters. It looks terrible, but the memery has led to its success.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      From what I’ve heard, being not AI generated was part of why it became popular, something along the lines of “at least they were willing to make bad looking art themselves instead of having a machine do it for them” or such. This just based on posts about it in my mastodon feed tho as I’m not on any Chinese social medias, so take that with a grain of salt.

      • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        nah, I’d trust mom and son over any executive anyway.

        visual garbage or not, it’s got love behind that powered it… unlike the ceo trash that has clear greed driven trash

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          With all due respect, if this movie is your gauge, an executive is a hell of a lot more trustworthy on what makes a good movie. And that is not a compliment to the executives.

          I’d go see it in theaters for the same reason everyone else is but no one thinks this is actually good. Everything about it is bad and not in a charming way.

          You can watch a subtitled fancam on YouTube. I only made it through 15 minutes or so then skipped around. It’s very hard to watch lol