- cross-posted to:
- microblogmemes@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- microblogmemes@lemmy.world
nixCraft on Mastodon
You must log in or register to comment.
Why should my pc be stable if I’m not stable
wanda.jpg
My arch system is so stable it’s boring. Year after year, just runs. Doesn’t slow down, doesn’t install crapware.
So I dont know. I’m happy with it.
Ironically, it’s the rolling release that’s much more stable for me.
“Stable” distros often had a long and risky process of upgrading to the next major release.
Meanwhile, my Arch install has been pretty damn stable for over 10 years and went through several different PCs.
deleted by creator
Why bcachefs over btrfs?
Sure bcachefs sounds like a pretty good idea, especially since the author thinks his AI coding assistant is sentient and a “her”. What is it with file system maintainers and mental illness…
You’re confusing two different meanings of stable. When people refer to “stable” distros such as Debian, they are referring to the meaning of stable as “unchanging,” not the meaning of stable as “doesn’t crash.”
A rolling release distro by that definition cannot be stable.
TBF “doesn’t crash” is generally why LTS-distros do “unchanging”.