True, but do democrats improve more than the previous republican made it worse? It doesn’t feel like it.

Also I wouldn’t use Healthcare as an example of something that works in the US

The issue is that even if you voted for the democrat every time, due to them not improving the living situation considerably you’ll always end up having the worse guy win at some point.

The only thing that would really help would be to finally start improving the living reality of the people.

A hole would be the entry point. Bacteris and spores are pretty small, so it could be a very small hole.

“Although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles, child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children, and many pedophiles do not molest children.”

That’s exactly what I am saying, calling every sexual abuse of children pedophilia makes it seem as if it was related to attraction, when most of the time it’s not.

You mean raping children surely, nobody would care if they wouldn’t act on their attraction.

I work in a Scrum team and we implement features iteratively, so we start with the minimal feature, merge it, get feedback, and go on from there.

At work there’s no excuse to keep a feature in a stale branch until you accumulate 1000 lines of code change.

I am just saying that it’s ridiculous to add deaths by famine to their death tolls. We’re not doing that for any other leader, and it’s nothing but anti communist propaganda, otherwise we’d be doing it for people like american presidents too.

Also the website you’re linking is not very objective, the Wikipedia article about Mao gives a way more balanced picture.

I am jokingly exaggerating the number to show how ridiculous it is to count deaths by famine that was not intentionally caused by Mao to his death toll.

How many people did Mao intentionally kill? If you want to count all deaths by famine, you’d end up with crazy numbers in teh US too, specially if you’d add deaths by lack of medical insurancw or other avoidable deaths. But do we say "President X killed Y people (sum of above)?

You mean because of the 5 billion deaths they caused, if we sum up all people that died in that time?

Compared to Netanyahu, Stalin and Mao were angels.

Oh look at me! I speak german (or used google translate)! Very cute.

But also thank you for proving my point.

You know, you could just chunk it up in a way to keep it readable.

If it could work without any ban, it most likely would already. It’s known for decades that the meat industry is a leading factor in climate change. So thw motivation would be there, if people were rwady to do so without being forced to.

Just a reminder that we closed the ozon layer by banning CFCs, not by having everybody boycott it on their own by their free will.

I just hope you’ll get treated how you treat others.

Wasn’t it just Kirk day?

Tell me about all the civil wars you’ve been part of. Wait even better, name me 3 civil wars without googling or Ai. I really love americans xD

You know that the e coli on the salad comes from the excrements of farmed animals that get spread on the fields because otherwise it would be expensive to get it all handled?

Also I live in the Midwest and I am fine as vegan, even during winter walking outside. And like most people I have a house and a heating anyways.

I’d actually argue that you’d have more problems cutting out the carbs during winter, than cutting out the meat.

You think somebody would actually ban meat farming in the first place? I like how naive you are.

The government has the police and the military, there’s no way a guy with a rifle is doing something against an F15.

You know, just like the prohibition, or banning drugs, you sign a law and because farms are usually big it’s easy to track them down.

I am sure farmers could get free money to compensate, just like they did when trump fucked the soy trade with China. I didn’t hear about tractors on streets when that happened.