Chainguard claims they had evidence of exploits being used in the wild. If that’s true breaking the embargo was the correct move. The embargo is only useful if the exploit isn’t in the wild.

Coincidence is not proof. Ad hominem arguments are not convincing. Please be better than right wing consoiracy nuts. Critical thinking is supposed to be our thing.

“Not mentioned in the ad: Acton and her brother were removed from the mother’s care as children after Acton accused her stepfather of sexual abuse. Her mother sided with the stepfather, leading to an estrangement that has lasted nearly 50 years.”

Leave it to Just Davenports Vance to side with child rapists.

https://www.defined.net/