That’s not shroedinger, that’s just logic. Hard concept for some people on here, it seems. For how well you understand right wing politics and tactics, it’s suprising you believe that the “left” wing would be much different.

Let’s say I need 51% of people to vote for me. I can get 41% with all the standard talking points of making things slightly less shitty. 10% I could get by shouting about the genocide in Gaza, but then I’d LOSE some from the 41%, because “I’m too extreme”. In this scenario, the leftists are responsible, AND not significant enough to pander to.

When a nazi sees a conservative and a democrat on the ballot, do you think he doesn’t vote, because the conservative didn’t call for the gassing of Jews?

You genuinely can’t be this dumb. There’s a giant difference between “blue in the white house” and “blue in power”. Yes, every bit helps, but we’ve had very few times where blue was truly in power, as in, White House, Senate, House were all blue majority. In those rare times, things did get better. Not fucking perfect, but way better.

And I still need all the haters to actually propose a real alternative that doesn’t involve wishful thinking, expecting millions to risk their life and liberty, or doesn’t sacrifice minoritized people on the altar of accelerationism. How many walmarts have you bombed recently?

Hey, so about your better idea, is it fire bombing walmarts? And are you actually going to do that?

Because I remember a tweetdocumentary about how that’s going…

Umm, akshually, since animals eat so many plants, eating meat is the far more effective move for plant haters.

Monkeys Paw twist: It includes all the animals you’ve eaten, making the number basically pointless for 99% of people.