“traitor to the West” sounds exactly like something a fascist would say, but since it’s about Ukraine everyone ignores it, cheers it on, even.

I’m taking yours.

Your grandma was weak, my grandma is a stoner.

Phosphorus can sometimes be found in chains. It’s not very stable, though.

Silicon too, it’s very similar, except silanes don’t like to exist.

No kisses for fr*nch “people.”

Lenin with boobs

If it does, then I’m glad some of us tried to stop it, at least.

That is my usual affect on people around me. DW too much, though, it’s not that bad, but it does look like slowly losing the emotional intensity of your memories of someone until remembering doesn’t send you into a crisis anymore.

“Overtly negative on anything from the West” lol.

deleted by creator

I’m not being condescending that’s really what it’s like. It’s never like they’re beside you again.

Sorry I don’t watch slop I couldn’t know about that. I’m sure she’s very close to the real thing.

Wdym not the time?

You are systematically dismantling your own arguments. “Tankie” is vague because it’s a word for a label and the underlying concept being referred to can be very different when different people say it.

People don’t become ghosts when they die or any of this kind of spiritual shit. People when they die become only the memories you have of them and you realize how little those memories actually matter.

The graphical artifacting of mental illness.

Because then the workers are just owned by capital when the point of the economy is still to create exchange value.

What happens then is the coops that pay their workers less will amass more capital than the ones that have better working conditions and push the better ones out of the market. When the goal is to generate profit, then a company that is privately owned by a capitalist class is the most efficient at doing that.

Yeah, exactly and also if you mention the Gaza genocide on Wikipedia without putting in a billion allegeds then you’ll also be banned, the article you linked even admits the definition has changed throughout history to refer to different things.

Anarchists and what would become social democrats were calling Marx an authoritarian socialist during the 1st International. This is not new. This debate has existed for at least 160 years, just let that sink in, we haven’t come to an agreement on this stuff for 160 years.

wikipedia, lmao, I could go in there and change the definition, lol.