Just a basic programmer living in California
Author of Paper Notebook Backup & Search
My personal website is sitr.us
SNW had a holodeck episode last season: Space Adventure Hour. They said it was a new technology they were evaluating. By the end of the episode they decided it wasn’t ready for safe use yet.
It’s a trick question! The intermix ratio is always 1:1!
Let’s not forget the policy changes that are going to kick millions of people off their healthcare plans - changes that are scheduled to take effect after the midterms. The $5k is like a bribe to allow yourself to be stabbed.
I could have looked more closely at the original Romani post. DHH argued that ranchers have a right to eliminate wolves by shooting them as an analogy for an argument to get rid of Romani. (Or as he calls them, “gypsies”). He’s a little vague about what he wants to be done to the Romani. But it looks like he identified an ethnic group, and described that group as a “problem”. The comparison to wolves implies he thinks there is something irredeemably problematic with the ethnic group. The analogy with eliminating wolves implies he thinks the ethnic group should be made to go away, somehow. There is no non-violent way to do that.
Edit: I think my words weren’t pointed enough. Romani are a vulnerable group who have been targeted for extermination in the past. The wolf analogy has clearly violent implications. Eliminating or removing or forcibly assimilating an ethnic group is inherently violent. DHH’s post is genocide talk.
I can see how from the perspective you’re coming from this looks like a “both sides are crazy” situation. But you’re description of the “far left” looks to me like the strawman propaganda you see from some right wing channels. And I get a sense you might not have dug into the points in the linked website.
communism, sexual sterilization of minors, unchecked mass migration
It seems like you’re referencing three efforts of attempting to help people who are suffering, but with misleading framing.
communism
Some on the left (including me) are pushing democratic socialism, which is not like the undemocratic Marxist-Leninist communism. From your framing I’d guess you think that “socialism” means no money or private enterprise. But that’s not necessarily true. The distinction between capitalism and socialism is specifically whether there is a class of people (capitalists) whose role is to own large portions of industry. Rather like how there used to be a class of nobility whose role was to rule, and people assumed it couldn’t work any other way. My understanding is democratic socialists are largely pushing for “market socialism” where there is money and private enterprise, but private companies are owned by their workers. For example AOC has made this case. If you think this idea is “objectively destructive” despite the opinion of others who disagree I think maybe you haven’t given the viewpoint a fair analysis. It’s easy to think of the status quo of modern capitalism as the only way, but modern capitalism has only existed for a couple of centuries, and has mutated substantially in that time.
sexual sterilization of minors
This frames bottom surgery as widespread at young ages, which is not true. It also glosses over the suffering that results when gender dysphoria is met with intolerance. Please don’t take at face value the strawman claim that gender-affirming care is “sterilization”. I’ll link to the Physicians for Reproductive Health gender-affirming care factsheet. FWIW people on the left interpret right-wing pushback on trans rights as bullying children, and can’t comprehend why people would do that.
unchecked mass migration
If this references opposition to Trump’s mass-deportation policy, there are important details you should be aware of. There a few problems. One is brutal treatment for what is legally a misdemeanor offense. (If you accumulated a big pile of speeding tickets, do think it would be fair to potentially permanently separate you from your children?) In response the government has deported people to countries they have never been to, including to a very unsafe war zone in South Sudan, and to indefinite imprisonment in CECOT in El Salvador. Many more have been held for who knows how long in thrown-together domestic concentration camps and over-crowded prisons with atrocious conditions. Another problem is doing the same to people who are following the rules. Did you know that ICE has staked out courthouses so they can arrest people at their own immigration hearings? Please try to remember that these are human people, some of whom have fled terrible conditions in their home countries, and who might have nowhere else to go.
The “both sides” take also glosses over the harm that the Omarchy boycott calls out. When people advocate killing off ethnic groups (as DHH has done according to the points in the linked website), that does sometimes lead to killing people of those ethnic groups.
I recommend at least watching Yesteryear, the episode about Spock’s childhood. That’s a good one, written by one of Star Trek’s most significant writers, D. C. Fontana.
If you want to learn what the deal is with Spock 2 you’ll have to watch a very, very strange episode.
I customized the top bar to resemble Gnome’s. That’s stuff like clock and notifications top-center, control center top-right, using the Cantarell font. It’s definitely not exactly the same. Here’s the config. (It’s written in Nix which generates the Noctalia config file.)
Some Gnome settings configure GTK which apply to GTK windows in non-Gnome window managers. But you wouldn’t be using Gnome’s control center. You’d use a combination of Noctalia’s control center (handles lots of stuff like wifi, bluetooth, audio inputs & outputs) plus the settings system of whichever window manager you use Noctalia with. The WM will manage stuff like display settings, and key bindings.
I think xdg support is mostly managed by the window manager? That’s stuff like screen & sharing, file pickers. I use Niri, and it’s got solid support for that stuff. Some of my favorite Niri features are how it handles screen sharing and privacy.
I heard about the story about how Paramount turned down the Babylon 5 pitch, then turned around and made Deep Space 9. Of course the two shows went in different directions, and are each great in different ways. But there are eyebrow-raising surface similarities. Both shows are named after a numbered space station, feature a commander who is a prophesized savior, have long story arcs, explore moral complexity.
Yesterday I watched the movie pilot, The Gathering. There is another similarity I hadn’t realized before: both commanders are romantically involved with a freighter caption whose name starts with “Ca”!
The sentient hologram idea bothers me. With Data they establish that consciousness is only possible with a specialized positronic neural net that is extremely difficult to reproduce. OTOH holograms are programs running in the ship’s computer. Ordinary programs, on ordinary (for Star Trek) computer chips.
Voyager is often written as though a hologram has some special physical properties that make it logically different from a computer program without a holographic projection. But I think it’s clearly established in TNG and DS9 that holograms are programs in the computer controlling projected force fields and replicated matter and whatnot.
I know The Doctor sometimes runs on the mobile emitter instead of the ship’s computer. And TNG did break its own rules with Moriarty. And arguably DS9 did too with Vic Fontaine. I don’t mind because these occasional exceptions are fun! The Doctor is the best part of Voyager! Mostly it bugs me when they imply that every computer program is sentient (but only if it’s connected to a projector!); or especially when they bring in photonic beings that somehow aren’t projections controlled by a computer and holographic hardware?
Maaaybe you could argue that Voyager holograms are special because the bio-neural circuitry has some of the same properties as positronic neural nets. But I don’t recall any explanation of that sort in the show.
You’re welcome! It’s a self-serving pleasure to show off my knowledge of Star Trek episodes.
Hmm… episodes where violence is the answer. The obvious candidates are the first two Borg episodes. Those were written to challenge the idea that diplomacy is always an option:
Other (less good) episodes with an enemy that can’t be reasoned with include Skin of Evil, and Conspiracy. And I suppose Time’s Arrow (but that one is a good episode).
Episodes where negotiation fails, and the Federation chooses violence:
There are a bunch of episodes where there is an individual, or a handful of individuals, who must be stopped. That’s a common story even in Star Trek. A couple that seem most relevant to me for this idea are:
It is a shorter list. After all, we’re not talking about TOS.
I considered Too Short a Season in my “Episodes about negotiation, but really it’s about a hotshot ambassador” category. But IIRC it’s ends up being a two-party negotiation - there isn’t a mediating party.
You already mentioned Angel One
Episodes where the crew clearly mediate a cultural conflict:
Episodes where the crew gets involved in an internal conflict (episodes with * are more action than negotiation):
Internal conflicts, but specifically Klingon politics where the two sides are Klingon factions:
Episodes about negotiation, but really it’s about a hotshot ambassador:
Honorable mention: The Price is mostly negotiations between several cultures. But there isn’t a clear mediating party. And the negotiation is over a purchase agreement, not a political disagreement.
At least you remembered your pants
This was the one: https://youtu.be/4tGTo_fnntQ?is=akrG41URIyTOivNA