secondary profile: /u/antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com

  • 8 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle














  • antonim@lemmy.worldOPto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    So, it has to be admitted that there’s no strong, direct evidence for it. The main argument in that thread is that he’s supposed to have some scarring, but none of the other photos from the time period show them either, so the guy just concludes they all must’ve been edited.

    And yes, the look is somewhat different from the other photos, mainly the eyes, more widely open than on the other pics. But people can hold different facial expressions…



  • antonim@lemmy.worldOPto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 days ago

    Yeah, I’d like a source too. The pic has been floating around a lot, first time I hear it’s edited.

    This version is on Wikipedia, no mention of it being modified (it looks different from the one in OP but as far as I see just due to sharpness and contrast):


  • antonim@lemmy.worldOPto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    Ngl I saved this meme a long time ago. I remembered I found it funny, but as I was posting it here I realised I forgot who’s the guy in the lower right. Some right wing shithead, but I just couldn’t remember the name.

    So, thank you for reminding me of Sam Hyde 👍


  • antonim@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldLike what you like
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    The only thing you listed that could be described as particularly inconsistent is spelling. But non-phonemic spelling is found in countless other languages and doesn’t really hamper the language. It might even be helpful for languages with diverse accents. English could be revised on some points with no issue (<island>, and some other cases), but overall it’s functional.

    As for the rest, I don’t know how phonetics could be inconsistent. Like, is it inconsistent that frogs is pronounced as /frogz/, but clocks as /kloks/, so the -s plural ending is realised differently in different words? As for grammar, what about it? Do you think it’s unusual for a language to have “irregular” forms such as buy-bought rather than *buyed? Tons of languages have them, I doubt if there’s any without “irregularities” at all.

    (Note: syntax is a part of grammar.)

    Viewing these things as a shitshow, as something particularly negative or even harmful, is literally anti-scientific.



  • antonim@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldLike what you like
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    So yeah, you haven’t really responded to the statement that your position is elitist, or at least smartassery that no linguist actually supports.

    maybe it was proposed because ‘ё’ denotes a very particular sound?

    Indeed. And then it wasn’t made generally mandatory, and then the Russian language continued to work fine.

    Which, notably, Western languages can never quite approximate

    Why would that be remotely notable here? We’re talking about Russian spelling of Russian language.

    perhaps because the letters are in a different position?

    And what is that position that makes the difference?