Is this the one you use to feed the house from a generator? If so, I think that’s the one time it’s valid

Was Spider-Man in the newspaper comics? I know they address it in the comic books

Maybe there is, maybe there isn’t. It’s absolutely not obvious though.

Uh, I posted her original tweet, literally first hand information.

You can argue that it’s a joke, but when you literally go online and say “Please rate my feet higher”, you can’t be surprised when people take you at face value and do the thing you specifically asked for.

When you make a post in a public space, you can’t expect everyone to know your lore. For example, my wife is a brown immigrant and I’ll make racist jokes to her about her ethnicity, which she laughs at because she knows I’m not racist and I’m punching at racism itself, not her race. But if I post those same jokes in public, people will assume I’m racist because they don’t have the context my wife does.

If she made the joke in the middle of a stream with context, you’d have a point. But she didn’t, she made a standalone tweet, and even said “Please”. That reads as pretty unambiguous consent.

Sometimes, but that doesn’t erase the fact that he doesn’t report to anyone. What happens if his moral compass is compromised? As the reader, we get to see the kind of person Peter Parker is so we trust him. But to JJJ, he’s just a random person with superpowers taking the law into his own hands.

I mean, Spider-Man is literally a masked vigilante with no chain of accountability. JJJ has legitimate concerns.

Eh, not sure “obvious joke” describes it.

The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.

To play devil’s advocate, there are no exposed blades at the point of use. I’d wager people who buy “bladeless” fans are more concerned with aesthetics and avoiding a crying toddler than they are with semantic accuracy. We call Wi-Fi “wireless” even though the router is plugged in.