Note that this account is meant to be specially prejudicial against instances, communities, users (even admins) who either don’t seem to be acting in good faith or if they claim to do so while being inconsistent or applying a heavy dose of favoritism.
The determination is substance based and involves whether they are condoning harassment or making unevenly applied claims and accusations, not just downvotes.
This means I’m not ignoring them, just not even seeing them
So once again someone who can’t even click on a link, or even bother to gloss over what was studied or what the results were to see if it even supports their alt-fictional view of the world.
It’s about the cheaper method of cooling, there’s no need for them to have to waste water if they recycled it correctly. It’s really a war about the latest hot investment getting all the socialist policies from the government versus people being milked through do-or-die capitalism by a government that only does the bare minimum to fulfill their obligations to them.
Ninja running with bomb vests, what devil has been unleashed.
It boggles my mind why Americans and the UK would accept this.
Wait, no it doesn’t.
Point taken, this is more sociological than science. Just because it’s is a study and is fact based doesn’t automatically make it scientific. The first comments are already about regurgitating some pretty horrible political takes that don’t even bother to check to see if they have anything to do with the study itself.