Ah, another person who thinks they solved the question for good and can’t see what the big deal is or why others may struggle more than you on the issue.

I don’t have time to argue this yet again. Feel free to tell one of the philosophy subs and see if they agree with you.

And to your political point, a ton of people held their nose and did like you said, only for people to blame them anyway for not winning the race. Arab-Americans rejected Trump and voted for Harris in swing states but she lost anyway and now people are scapegoating them as if her loss was their fault. (Even though she lost states like Michigan by a margin greater than the entire Arab-American population there).

It’s ABSOLUTELY a protest, despite trying to rebrand it otherwise.

Shame on these parents for using their kids as a prop for their politics.

And yet there’s still Sikh terrorists.

Every religion produces extremists and people who try to twist the religion to justify their existing hate and politics. It’s a constant of humanity.

A reporter already asked him and he said he’ll be at work and not home.

Seems to perfectly describe the issue from my perspective

Then you fail to understand why the Trolley problem is an actual problem and why the ethics of of it are STILL debated. This is not as simple as you pretend it is, and while you can make excuses for your own choice it doesn’t mean the problem is solved.

And that text is falsely framing the issue to mock those who have a different opinion than the author.

In the TNG episode Descent, Data tries to run a physically dangerous experiment and turn off the safety protocols, but this time the computer requires 2 officers to authorize it. I guess they finally got smart after a few years?

This is called a straw man argument.