• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • You’re just shitting all over quality candidates because you’re terrified of losing. You have this backwards logic of “I will only support them when they get support” and, if you truly believe that, you expect others to follow it as well. But if everyone follows it, where does that leave you?

    By not supporting someone, you are contributing to what people see as “electable qualities” and YOU are saying that something can’t be done. This is how centrists, who are really just conservatives, have become so fucking pervasive.


  • You are so desperate to side-step the entire fact that Ai, as it stands, is being implemented irresponsibly and its use and support is directly tied to the further degradation of our freedoms. I don’t give a shit if it’s good or bad when used with pure intentions, I care that its very existence right now is unnecssary, inefficient, and a direct attack on the working class. I care that for all the productivity claims, no one is getting a shorter work week except the people who are being fired and going down to 0 hours. I care that data centres are a disaster wherever they’re built, be it to the environment or the quality of life of those who live nearby.

    You cannot support the working class and use Ai. It is the same as how you cannot support trans people and still get down with Harry Potter. Companies like OpenAi LOVE when you say “I don’t support ____ but when I use it, it’s different” because they know that at that point they still have your money and that you’ll let them do whatever they want as long as you can still pretend that you’re better.

    Fuck Ai.



  • Zohran Mamdani only had 4 years of experience before becoming a highly effective mayor of fucking New York City, are you high off your fucking balls?! Experience doesn’t mean jack shit if it’s just been decades of being terrible at your job. Being old doesn’t mean jack-shit unless you’re old and bitter that younger people are better than you at stuff.

    I’m talking specifically about you walking in here feeling yourself up because you don’t have any fight left in you. Yes, I’m sure this Kelly fella wouldn’t be the end of the world but oh my god ya’ll are fucking cowards. Frankly, so are us Canadians for the exact same reasons. You lose because you’ve decided you’re gunna lose before anything has even started, and you lose because the only thoughts in your head are based on propaganda.

    “I would vote for _____ but they might not win so…“ actually piss off to the bottom of the ocean.



  • You would need a piece of metal long enough to support, of which there are very clearly none even if they remained at their full length. It’s also a massive truck, and I’d dare you to get even just a fast moving motorcycle up there. As for your “it could be moving” comment no it fucking couldn’t. The picture is in focus, the subject well centered, and there’s already a fire truck and burn marks.

    What probably happened was some kind of explosion or other damage and someone photoshopped in the truck because it was funny.







  • Soup@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldMath is hard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The text says “the answer” and 25% having two ways to get to it does not mean there are two answers. You can’t just say you’re avoiding assumptions and then make more assumptions that are even more outlandish.

    Ultimately, you can’t really side-step how impossible it is to answer it correctly. The answer is to write in “e) fuck off”


  • Soup@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldMath is hard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    2 out of 4 answers are the same, and if we say that 25% is correct then you actually have a much higher chance of selecting the correct one. I’m sure there’s some statistics crap to say it’s not 50%, but if half your random choices are correct then that seems right to me. So now 50% is correct, but it’s only 1 in 4 and the odds go back to 25%. So now it’s 0%, except that that’s ALSO on there so now the correct answer is 25% again. The problem is that ever single time 25% becomes the correct answer you now have a 50% chance to get it right if chosen randomly and it’s wrong all over again.