Tbh, the jargon is probably clearer than the translation is. You just need to learn what words mean.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
- HarneyToker@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•It'll come! Like the DOGE checks!115·2 days ago
His response is a fucking sentence fragment with no meaning without a bending of English syntax and heavy context.
- HarneyToker@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Why do authoritarian states have 'Democratic' or 'People's' in their names?11·15 days ago
Same reason it’s called “United States” and we all fucking hate each other.
- HarneyToker@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Did not expect Five Nights at Fruleddy’sEnglish1·4 months ago
Spotify is for people that hate the music industry. Pay the same amount to literally any other streaming service for better quality streaming and more payout to artists. The extra money you’re paying for no increase in product quality goes directly to lining financiers pockets. Can’t believe people still use that garbage.
Afraid to answer the question when it’s not an ad hominem. Go ahead and attack me. I don’t mind cowards.
Where are you from?
Possibly, but I’m pretty sure the “translation” doesn’t actually mean anything while the technical jargon is actually telling you something. What does an ion being “floofier” even mean? If I’m trying to communicate something about ions to someone and I’m “translating”, I’ll need to translate multiple times and ways to make it make sense to multiple people, when the listener could go look up the technical jargon themselves and get the idea of the statement.
Technical jargon exists for a reason, it is truly simpler than using ambiguous language because you don’t need to keep explaining yourself to get one concept across. Complicated concepts need very specific words, can’t always use 5th grade reading level material.