I distinctly remember hearing:
There were rooftop cheers from a Muslim community in New Jersey.
There was cheering in Gaza.
That rooftop thing was a continual news cycle item for weeks. I recall it being debunked but none of the details.
I distinctly remember hearing:
There were rooftop cheers from a Muslim community in New Jersey.
There was cheering in Gaza.
That rooftop thing was a continual news cycle item for weeks. I recall it being debunked but none of the details.
I remember when he stepped on a lego and it hurt so bad he jumped up and down and hopped on one foot right into an intimate massage parlor and his credit card fell out of his pocket and he paid to exploit sex traffic victims.
Good times. What a nanny set of circumstances.
I’m kind of with you in that pink’s positions off but I can’t quite put my finger in why it’s off brand. It definitely feels off brand but I honestly can’t articulate it.
I’m worried it would be used by the people in power to surprese discourse.
“Uh guys, have you noticed that everyone in power has connections to Epstein?”
knock knock oy mate you got a loisense for those opinions?”
I read it as a women who is into or married to a women criticizing “a man” but really men in general. I didn’t read it as a divorced women having marriage flashbacks and I do think it would be worded differently if that was the truth.
I mean, a slave is a sapient being and a bee is an insect and may not even be sentient.
I guess arguing “the bugs just love working” and “the blacks just love working” strikes me as fundamentally different.
I don’t think there is a dietary restriction that doesn’t draw a complete arbitrary line at some point.
Fish isn’t meat is just the pope compromising with fishermen. Not eating an oyster but eating corn is a fairly arbitrary line as well.
Yes?