Not particularly, no. A lot of tech people have been pushing the idea for years largely because it means that they would know what everyone would get on a monthly basis, and could adjust their subscription fees accordingly. The real solution is just to make society more equal, would effectively accomplish the same thing (at least in the US) if there were no more billionaires and public funds were properly allowed (ie Medicare for all) to improve the basics of society.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
- Addv4@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think UBI will be the future of the world?21·30 days ago
- Addv4@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you ever reminisce about an old phone you had in the past?11·30 days ago
HTC m8 and m9. Those were such good phones…
“Oops, left a mess (had a crumb on the counter). $350 cleaning fee.”
Yeah, but surely they have much more limited ad revenue than YouTube, given that a lot of the ads I see on those sites are ones that pay out less (like the shitty porn ads). Personally, I suspect it’s actually competition between piracy sites that has lowered the overall ads, because you have more choices than just one in comparison to YouTube, where you can use it or leave it.
Uh, you gotta pay hosting somehow, so most piracy sites rely on ad revenue to exist. It’s less overhead, but it ain’t completely free.
I mean, it’s not like it’s gonna wrap up anytime soon, might as well get some points against Trump while they’re at it…