Gormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1929arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1920arrow-down1external-linkGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netGormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square59linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoYou can. He says that it’s not relevant. Now you tell him why he’s wrong. You don’t whine because he’s disrespectful.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·1 month ago Now you tell him why he’s wrong. he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 month agoYou know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”. But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·1 month agobut I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait. I want to humiliate rage baiters
minus-squareAzuranAurora@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 month agoYou’re only humiliating yourself.
You can. He says that it’s not relevant. Now you tell him why he’s wrong. You don’t whine because he’s disrespectful.
he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”.
But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
but I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait.
I want to humiliate rage baiters
You’re only humiliating yourself.