• Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lmao. Your unflinting biological bias is hilarious. Even with the qualifier that is absurd

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re right that it’s nowhere near 100% like I suggested. But ya, I wear that bias with pride.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get your bias, but in this instance the human experts he’d be listening to would be health insurance lobbyists, not people who care about others’ health. ChatGPT, which is obviously incapable of feeling compassion, may very well have more compassion for human life compared to those.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts.