Study led by researchers at the Bloomberg School of Public Health finds boys circumcised just after birth did not have a higher risk of autism compared to uncircumcised boys
  • AeronMelon@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    15 days ago

    Wow, glad we got that cleared up in 2026.

    The “everything causes autism” groupthink really downplays and distracts from the long-standing but poorly-communicated fact that circumcision offers no health benefit that regular bathing won’t cure.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      14 days ago

      I’m confused… How does regular bathing reduce the spread of HIV and other STIs? How does it remove phimosis?

      I’m definitely not saying that the procedure is the right thing to do for infants, but factually there absolutely are medical uses and upsides for some people.

      Edit: Downvotes don’t make me incorrect. Use your words. Talk with me like a person. I’m open to being wrong.

    • nagaram@piefed.socialEnglish
      1·
      15 days ago

      Its crazy to me that the ONLY serious reason anyone gives for why they get babies circumcised is

      “I don’t wanna tell my child how to clean their penis”

      What a fucking shame. The child rearing fans really wanna make a whole child and then pay a doctor to mutilate them instead of acknowledge they have genitals!

      • some_designer_dude@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        15 days ago

        I’d assume it’s more like they don’t want to have to explain to their kid why their penis doesn’t look at all like Daddy’s. Not that it’s a much better reason, though. Curious how many non-circumcised fathers opt for their kids to be circumcised.

        • nagaram@piefed.socialEnglish
          0·
          15 days ago

          No if you ask almost every time they will site “hygiene issues”

          Or they will say “women prefer it” or something insane.

          And that’s assuming they don’t cite religion which is crazy in the US because Christianity does not in any way require it at its core.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.caEnglish
            1·
            14 days ago

            Or they will say “women prefer it” or something insane

            Foreskins increase girth when rolled back.

          • TransNeko@lemmy.worldEnglish
            01·
            15 days ago

            it’s a holdover from when Jews required all Christians (heretics) have their genitalia mutilated for identification purposes.

            Hey look… Israel hold’s America’s leash in the same way that a dog owner holds the leash of a bitch in heat…

            And hey look… Israel loves mutilating genitalia. it’s their 3rd favorite pastime right behind raping children (#1) and butchering Palestinians (#2).

            • PerogiBoi@lemmy.caEnglish
              1·
              14 days ago

              That’s insane fiction lmao where did you hear this? Jews have always been a minority so the idea that they’re making all the rules is out to lunch haha.

              Jews circumsize as an homage to a story in the Bible. It’s supposed to represent a covenant with God.

              Judaism doesn’t view other religions as inferior or wrong. Just different. This is actually a neo-nazi trope used by the American KKK and other ideologically tangential groups to get more people to be sus about Jews.

              The reason North Americans largely circumsize (or used to ) is due to evangelical control and fear of masturbation. It was believed that removing foreskin would limit masturbation (it doesn’t). Go look into Kellog and circumcision.

              You’re conflating Israel’s war crimes with Judaism and spouting Nazi-ajacent rhetoric whether your aware of it or not.