• lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    “ensure publishers at least do not use generative AI across external services such as marketing materials, platform porting, QA testing”

    QA is by far the most AI heavy part of the process at the moment, all the tedious basic checks are offloaded to a process that plays the game 24/7 at breakneck speed.

    The actual humans spend time finding issues that “feel” wrong, something AI can’t do because it has no taste.

    Unless your QA engineers work for American service industry wages ($2 plus tips), not using AI assisted tooling is just stupid.

    EDIT: Love the downvotes from people with ideology but no idea how the sausage is made 💖 If you think I’m wrong, argue with me. But I’m not, I do this for a living.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yes, it doesn’t generate funny pictures but they do generate player “stories”, basically synthesising the way players play the game.

        And a multimodal LLM can look at the game and “see” if something is wrong. Like “go here in the map, look here and there should be a monster of type X there”.

        • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Do you have access to a resource with more detailed information about how this works? It seems really interesting