• Forester@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    What has been tested and proven. It’s just it hasn’t seen large-scale deployment because nimbyism

    • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      well yes but also not really.

      Nuclear reactors are incredibly expensive, take forever to build, test, and ensure they are safe, often require additional not-so-green/renewable secondary materials/processes that are conveniently ignored (mines, for example) and waste disposal is a semi-serious non-solved issue.

      All of these factors combined are significantly more important than the land the power is generated on, as 99% of the world has space somewhere.

      The reality of nuclear power is that it doesn’t make sense in 95% of scenarios anymore because battery + solar / wind is effectively free in comparison, can be built and scaled extremely fast, and is many times more renewable because basically everything is recyclable.