• P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The shocking part is where it says that’s only 5X the cops for a town that size. Wtf? One or two should suffice in a town that small. We have a town here with just over a thousand, and they have no city cops at all.

      • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        10 cops means 1-2 on shift at a time, once you figure in days off, needing people working 24 hours a day, a leadership position or two, and people out sick/vacation, 10 people isn’t as many as it sounds.

        However, even 10 is a huge amount for a town of 250. I think most towns of 1-2k people generally don’t have a department and usually rely on county police.

        • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I lived in a town like this (USA). We had no cops and the fire department was volunteer only. I recall a house burning down to the cement foundation over a couple hours, fire dept came by to put out the ruins. No one was hurt.

          Can’t imagine having 2 cops in that town, let alone 50. No money.

          The post office used to be in the same building as the bank (until the bank burnt down). They moved into the lower floor of a house.

            • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yea probably. The bank burnt down before I was born, but without knowing what happened I would guess it was arson for insurance money. There’s no way it was profitable to run a bank there.