RobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agoUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down12
arrow-up1178arrow-down1external-linkUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comRobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoTrue, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoyou can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agothe display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agooh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.
True, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
you can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
oh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.