• Ghoelian@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not separate, but it is a living thing. If you starved your hand off by constricting the blood flow, I don’t think anyone would question you when you say your hand is dead.

    Actually isn’t that literally called dying off in English?

    • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think we’re using 2 different meanings of “dead” here. There’s “dead” as in “dead tissue” and “dead” as in “corpse”. My point was that a fetus fits the first meaning of “dead”, but not the second. You can’t “kill” a fetus.

      • Ghoelian@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t really think we are. A corpse is also just dead tissue after all. I don’t think there’s a significant difference in semantics here.

        At the end of the day I don’t think we should be debating the meaning of the words, just what we think they represent.

        The main difference (to me) is when it’s a separate living being. I would definitely call a just-conceived foetus “alive”, but it’s not an individual yet, and I would have no issue with aborting it.

        Also I do want to make clear I’m very pro-abortion. I’m just autistic and get triggered by “misinformation” (this isn’t misinformation but again my autistic ass can’t think of the proper term).