• khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well I was curious so I did.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery

    Long story short it has an ass load of unexploded ordinance, an exclusion zone around it and a cautionary tale…

    One of the reasons that the explosives have not been removed was the unfortunate outcome of a similar operation in July 1967, to neutralise the contents of the Polish cargo ship Kielce, that sank in 1946, off Folkestone in the English Channel. During preliminary work, Kielce exploded with a force equivalent to an earthquake measuring 4.5 on the Richter scale, digging a 20-foot-deep (6 m) crater in the seabed and bringing “panic and chaos” to Folkestone, although there were no injuries. Kielce was at least 3 or 4 miles (4.8 or 6.4 km) from land, had sunk in deeper water than Richard Montgomery, and had “just a fraction” of the load of explosives.

    • BeatL@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Thank a lot. It was interesting.

      Yeah dumping ammunition and bomb in water make them less predictible, able to spontaneously explode and even in water the amount of explosive will directly damage humans life and building. Even if it does not explode it contaminate water, fauna, flaura and humans.

      The article explain that yes, the government is aware, yes the risk is imminent, yes they will do something… in 2001… yes nothing is done. yes they are surveys… yes they confirm the risk is even more imminent…

      Fuck.