This is not a SFW instance. NSFW communities will be tagged, and efforts will be made to keep SFW communities clean, but proceed at your own comfort level.
It’s not a wall of text, you lazy bum. I have already explained my position to you. Once again, you have refused to read it. Go back, read what I wrote, and all of your questions will be answered. If I’m hiding behind a wall of text, then you’re hiding behind your own laziness.
And it’s less than five minutes of reading. I’m not putting in the effort to explain things to you again if you’re just going to refuse to read it because it’s “too long.”
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
Secondly, aside from the gibberish I responded with above, the first thing you refused to read was my own words. They weren’t ChatGPT-generated.
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
It’s entirely relevant. If you support these things it makes sense why you would support politicians who do. If you don’t support these things then you need to explain why you support politicians who do. We can’t have a conversation about why you and I see politicians differently without examining each other’s reasons for doing so. I made an assumption earlier that you don’t support ICE or warrantless surveillance like Flock. But here you are outright refusing to say so. My assumptions were incorrect.
You support these politicians because you support fascism in the form of ICE and warrantless surveillance. You’re a fascist supporter.
We were originally talking about how, if Obama and a group of Democratic senators had done things differently, Trump wouldn’t be in office. Now we’re talking about ice and flock cameras, which are complete non sequiturs.
And you can’t prove that it was generated with ChatGPT. So why even bring that up?
Did you actually read my wall of text?
This conversation isn’t going to go the way you wanted it to. We’re not going to talk about what you want to talk about, and I’m not going to let you fall back on whatever scripted response you’re accustomed to giving.
So either stop being lazy, actually read what I wrote, and respond to the argument I made, or stop replying.
You force people to make assumptions about your beliefs when you won’t answer simple questions about them. This isn’t complicated.
You support fascist policies and rather than just own up to it you’re evading. It’s pathetic. If you can’t state your beliefs with your chest then go hide in the corner.
Buddy in the age of chatGPT spitting out walls of text isn’t the flex you think it is.
Proper beliefs depend on strong foundations. When I ask to see your foundations you hide behind walls of text. Your foundations are weak and rotting.
I’ll ask you again.
Did you support ICE in 2009? Did you support warrantless surveillance in 2009?
It’s not a wall of text, you lazy bum. I have already explained my position to you. Once again, you have refused to read it. Go back, read what I wrote, and all of your questions will be answered. If I’m hiding behind a wall of text, then you’re hiding behind your own laziness.
And it’s less than five minutes of reading. I’m not putting in the effort to explain things to you again if you’re just going to refuse to read it because it’s “too long.”
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
Secondly, aside from the gibberish I responded with above, the first thing you refused to read was my own words. They weren’t ChatGPT-generated.
It’s entirely relevant. If you support these things it makes sense why you would support politicians who do. If you don’t support these things then you need to explain why you support politicians who do. We can’t have a conversation about why you and I see politicians differently without examining each other’s reasons for doing so. I made an assumption earlier that you don’t support ICE or warrantless surveillance like Flock. But here you are outright refusing to say so. My assumptions were incorrect.
You support these politicians because you support fascism in the form of ICE and warrantless surveillance. You’re a fascist supporter.
You can’t prove that.
You’re making assumptions across the board.
We were originally talking about how, if Obama and a group of Democratic senators had done things differently, Trump wouldn’t be in office. Now we’re talking about ice and flock cameras, which are complete non sequiturs.
And you can’t prove that it was generated with ChatGPT. So why even bring that up?
Did you actually read my wall of text?
This conversation isn’t going to go the way you wanted it to. We’re not going to talk about what you want to talk about, and I’m not going to let you fall back on whatever scripted response you’re accustomed to giving.
So either stop being lazy, actually read what I wrote, and respond to the argument I made, or stop replying.
You force people to make assumptions about your beliefs when you won’t answer simple questions about them. This isn’t complicated.
You support fascist policies and rather than just own up to it you’re evading. It’s pathetic. If you can’t state your beliefs with your chest then go hide in the corner.
I don’t need to state my beliefs. I’ve stated my case and you refused to read it.
Go read what you called my wall of text and respond to that. Otherwise you’re just talking talking out your ass.
You support fascism. 🤷 You’re gross.