• Swemg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Lol, if touching a side mirror gets you that angry you need to look in a mirror and think about whats wrong with you. Also I’m a carpenter, I most often have my tools with me, I could do way worse than “hitting” a side mirror if you really need something to get upset about. I bet you get half hard looking at your rolling box ^^

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Unpopular opinion: Cars are expensive. Vandalizing them in response to an inconvenience seems like an overreaction.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad.

          Not sure I’d consider them “symmetrical” though… Maybe I’m being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse.

          Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy.

      • Swemg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn’t an inconvenience tho. It’s straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn’t seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        True. However given that they’re the largest “lifestyle” contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything.