This is not a SFW instance. NSFW communities will be tagged, and efforts will be made to keep SFW communities clean, but proceed at your own comfort level.
HPV vaccines (stops cervical cancer) are a thing here for girls and they don’t get them until they’re 12. They just go around the schools. This seems like it could be done later too, maybe at the same time.
The vaccine schedule for kids is already pretty hefty. I can’t remember how many times we had to get them to the doctor but it felt like a lot when you’re already frazzled.
Boys should really get it too, they can transmit the virus causing the cancer… I think in Germany they just did a marketing campaign about this recently to push vaccination rates among men.
True the schedule was already quite a thing, though it probably felt like more than it was. Perhaps they find a way to administer the mRNA vaccines orally like with the old polio one (but this time safely!), that way you could perhaps “sneak” it into a piece of candy or sth.
Many of the cancers it prevents can be gotten regardless of sex. Among the cancers are throat and colorectal.
Also prevents genital warts, which aren’t dangerous (HPV either will cause warts or cancer depending on the strain), but like, you can ensure you don’t get genital warts
For comparison: the UK initially concluded the cost-benefit ratio was in favour of girls-only HPV vaccination, but IIUC updated this assessment and offered it to boys too after a public campaign by Jaime Winstone.
Vaccinating everyone in the UK against everything for which vaccines are available (even against diseases with very low risk in the UK) would cost so much that the NHS would have to cut treatments with very high benefit-to-cost ratio.
Therefore, below a certain benefit-to-cost threshold, the UK has no reasonable choice except to withhold public funding. The HPV vaccine for boys was right on that threshold. IMO, the UK did the right thing by funding the clear benefit (HPV vaccine for girls, whose risk was significantly higher per existing evidence) and extending it to boys when additional evidence showed it was worth doing so.
HPV vaccines (stops cervical cancer) are a thing here for girls and they don’t get them until they’re 12. They just go around the schools. This seems like it could be done later too, maybe at the same time.
The vaccine schedule for kids is already pretty hefty. I can’t remember how many times we had to get them to the doctor but it felt like a lot when you’re already frazzled.
Boys should really get it too, they can transmit the virus causing the cancer… I think in Germany they just did a marketing campaign about this recently to push vaccination rates among men.
True the schedule was already quite a thing, though it probably felt like more than it was. Perhaps they find a way to administer the mRNA vaccines orally like with the old polio one (but this time safely!), that way you could perhaps “sneak” it into a piece of candy or sth.
Many of the cancers it prevents can be gotten regardless of sex. Among the cancers are throat and colorectal.
Also prevents genital warts, which aren’t dangerous (HPV either will cause warts or cancer depending on the strain), but like, you can ensure you don’t get genital warts
Yeah I’m not sure what the reasoning is behind not giving it to boys but it’s not part of the national vaccine schedule.
Cost-benefit is the likely reason.
For comparison: the UK initially concluded the cost-benefit ratio was in favour of girls-only HPV vaccination, but IIUC updated this assessment and offered it to boys too after a public campaign by Jaime Winstone.
Every time such a calculation is made they should be forced by law to publicize the calculated worth of a humans life and/or health.
In the UK at least, decisions and rationale about which vaccinations and treatments should be publicly-funded via the NHS are published quite transparently. For example: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/story/preventing-cancer-extending-vaccination-boys
Vaccinating everyone in the UK against everything for which vaccines are available (even against diseases with very low risk in the UK) would cost so much that the NHS would have to cut treatments with very high benefit-to-cost ratio.
Therefore, below a certain benefit-to-cost threshold, the UK has no reasonable choice except to withhold public funding. The HPV vaccine for boys was right on that threshold. IMO, the UK did the right thing by funding the clear benefit (HPV vaccine for girls, whose risk was significantly higher per existing evidence) and extending it to boys when additional evidence showed it was worth doing so.