You must log in or register to comment.
Relevant XKCD:
if $1 is not installed after that, wipe your hard drive and start over
How am I still learning about XKCDs I’ve never seen especially ones in the 1000 range.
Congrats on being one of today’s lucky 10,000!
Is this satire or is it from a real project O_O?
It is a self-contained runbook with explicit verification gates at every step — preflight checks, building libghidra, installing the LibGhidraHost Ghidra extension, building ghidrasql, and a first live query. Hand it to your agent and let it drive the install; intervene only if a gate reports a failure.
Even the install instructions are written by AI. Good grief
I bloody hope the whole post is satire but given the anti-ai groupthink on lemmy, fuck knows!
Yes, it is the people who are against the corporate AI offerings who are guilty of groupthink, not me!
To be fair, there are local agentic models.
I dont think local agentic models address the ethical and environmental concerns I have with the training - but its better than the corporate offerings :)
Hey guy/gal/genderfluid pal, the cat is out of the bag. Either we embrace it for what it can do in a much more sustainable way, or we let corpos redefine sustainable.
Is this a good use case? No. But most use cases, I’d rather have a local agent running on my own hardware being offset by solar, than using a corpo offering.
Please don’t call me man :)
The cat is “out of the bag” on consuming meat and dairy, plenty of people manage to survive and thrive without em, without much effort at all. I’d personally rather use no LLM than use a local agentic model with poor ethics/environmental impact of its training, even if the latter is better than corpo offerings.
As I alluded to, I’m much happier to see people using local agentic models. Even more so if they happen to be something like Pleias’ approach, with lots of transparency about the data they were trained on. There’s still the environmental concerns behind the resources consumed for the training, but it is about as good as one could hope for at this point if one insists on using LLMs.
There are two big piles of groupthink here.
What a stupid comment
Eh, mine added value to the conversation. Your “what a stupid comment” comment made no such effort. So hey, swings and roundabouts!
No it didn’t
Ok bye
Isn’t this actually kinda what AI is good for? I mean a simple task that just takes time and has step-by-step instructions, and you can just let it handle it and do it faster. Like its almost as good as writing a long script that just does it for the user?
As someone who had his relatively fine and deterministic scripts replaced by skill.md bullshit by coworkers – no. This is exactly the things AI is the worst fit for.
We’ve already ran into it halucinating complete result data-set, because it ran into an error but the skill mentioned that it should give the results data to the user. So it just made it up, since it couldn’t get it by following the correct process.
It has also ran wrong builds or input parameters, because it confused their order.
I’ve also seen it skip a step.
I’m pretty confident that the AI running this script will eventually, for someone, run into an issue with getting one of the dependencies, and go on a wild goose chase in trying to satisfy it, eventually running into one of the typosquatting malware repositories or clones. Not to mention that there are groups that are actively poisoning AIs that search the web to feed them their malware-ridden typosquatting libraries instead.
If you suck so much you can’t write a simple script like this (or just can’t be bothered), you should at least just ask the AI to write it for you, so you have a deterministic set of steps that you are confident will always behave the same.
You can do fun things with hooks to make sure they don’t skip steps. but yes I agree with you that this is terrible.