
Clambake0351
- 3 Posts
- 30 Comments
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoNews@lemmy.world•Trump replaces Susie Wiles with Stephen Miller as chief of staff after GOP's midterm defeatEnglish52·15 hours ago
- Clambake0351@piefed.zipOPtoscience@lemmy.world•Do cats fart? An investigation into the mysteries of feline flatulenceEnglish3·1 day ago
Thankfully, I haven’t noticed excessive farting in Archie. But I still have questions. Is my cat farting more or less than a small dog, say, a Chihuahua? What do cat farts usually smell like? And at what point is some farting too much farting?
Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL that some dude in California running a 3-person company got voters to give him $4.2 billion by authoring a ballot measure, which passedEnglish5·1 day ago
The numbering is weird, there aren’t actually 50 Propositions because you need a certain number of signatures to get something onto the ballots. Only like 10 Propositions actually make it onto the ballot each year.
Everyone is eligible to receive a mailer that contains the full wording of the proposition, a couple of pages summary with complete “for” and “against” arguments (and rebuttals), as well as a ~2 paragraph summary from a coalition of folks representing the “for” and “against” campaigns.
On top of that, outside groups like DSA provide “Voter guides” like the above, that you can independently research.
The ballot itself just has a title. You are not required to read anything to vote, but I’d wager most folks just read the official “for” and “against” blurbs and form an opinion.
ETA: You can see the official voter guides here, just scroll to the PDFs and choose your preferred language.
To be honest and blunt, the quick reference opposition arguments were quite weak, which is likely what carried this proposition over the line.

- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•[META] TIL we have no rule against flooding the community with excessive postsEnglish261·2 days ago
Communities are not legal institutions. The rules are suggestions to keep the community organized and on subject.
Just because a rule doesn’t exist, doesn’t mean mods are powerless to react to content that breaks the social order.
Not everything needs a rule unless it’s a significant problem or common misunderstanding.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoNews@lemmy.world•Hegseth is not under consideration as jockeying begins for Tennessee Senate seat, AP source saysEnglish12·2 days ago
Please let Hegseth be the GOP nominee, dude is practically radioactive for abusing troops and being a key player of the economic nightmare we find ourselves in.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL that some dude in California running a 3-person company got voters to give him $4.2 billion by authoring a ballot measure, which passedEnglish14·2 days ago
That endorsement from the Michael J Fox Foundation carried a lot of weight, it seems.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptopolitics @lemmy.world•Oil companies spent over $2 million on Meta ads in the lead-up to the midterms | That’s twice the amount spent by the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club, and Greenpeace – combined.English8·2 days ago
Yeah, it does imply that, which is why they compared the top 3 oil companies to the top 3 environmental groups.
Together, Shell, Exxon, and Chevron spent $2.1 million on “social issue” ads on Facebook and Instagram between late July and late October 2026. In the same period, three of the top climate and environmental groups – the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club, and Greenpeace – spent just over $846,000, less than half the amount spent by oil companies.
But also, it doesnt matter because they could have focused on Shell alone who outspent all three Climate groups combined

- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoUplifting News@lemmy.world•Solar production keeps exceeding predictionsEnglish14·2 days ago
Solar generated 2,807 TWh of electricity worldwide in 2025, 8.8% of the total.
(Source)
Its taken us decades to get to this point and solar can easily do 5x that much generation without even thinking the word battery, and close to 10x with just daily battery backup.
Surely it’ll plateau any second now…
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptopolitics @lemmy.world•Hakeem Jeffries Says Impeachment and Getting Even Aren’t PrioritiesEnglish193·3 days ago
Look, I’m tired of Jefferies smug “I tweeted about it, what more do you want” face, but I do want to call out a bit of a hypocrisy I’m seeing here on Lemmy.
Theres a bunch of folks clamoring about how they want Democrats to focus on trying to fix things and not just waste time on impeachment, but then Jefferies says that’s what he’s gonna do and everyone is back to WHAT ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.
Personally I’m a fan of the walk and chew approach of doing both, but seeing a lot of people bickering about what Democrats should do for the next two years as if nothing they do will be sufficient.
For me, for now, I’m just glad we slowed the bleeding.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptopolitics @lemmy.world•WA Initiative 638 to ban trans girls in school sports leadsEnglish171·3 days ago
Reminder that gay marriage failed in California back in '08.
People will come around, but it takes time to overcome ignorance at this scale.
For now, it’s on all of us to do what we can to support the community and highlight how these injustices impact real people - hate thrives on ignorance.
- Clambake0351@piefed.zipOPtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Shots fired from the Daily ShowEnglish11·3 days ago
You know she could have declined the appointment right?
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•What would you do with a small loan of a million dollars?English3·4 days ago
My home loan is less than that and it already hurts to pay every month. With a second big loan, I’d have to declare bankruptcy.
Now if this is a gift of free money - I’d pay off that damn home loan so it’s one less thing to worry about. Remaining balance on the $1M would probably get invested in the hopes that I could push forward my retirement by a couple of decades.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoNo Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•How come in handbrake if I put a bunch of movies at once in the queue it increases their size? But if I individually do every movie it condenses?English5·4 days ago
This doesn’t at all answer your question, but Handbrake has always frustrated me by being aggressively opaque.
Like if you’re not trying to encode something to run on an iPod Nano from 2007, the presets are all arbitrary and wacky, and it gives you very little control over the underlying commands.
I GREATLY prefer StaxRip. It strikes the right balance for transparency, automation, and configuration for me. Closest thing to working with commands from scratch, without all of the headache. Only downside is it’s only built for Windows.
- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•I'm new on Lemmy. What I'm supposed to know here ?English644·4 days ago
It works with Edge on Windows 11

- Clambake0351@piefed.ziptoNews@lemmy.world•Trump Shreds Democratic Candidates in Frantic 1 AM Election Morning Outburst: ‘El-Sayed Hates Jews and Hates Blacks!’English401·4 days ago
El-Sayed Hates Jews and Hates Blacks!
… Is he trashing El-Sayed or is he trying to get his supporters to vote blue?
Yes and no, mostly no, but it’s open to interpretation.
Short version, he bragged about not voting for Harris, with the nuance (which is so easily lost in today’s society) that she was all but guaranteed to win California, so his protest vote did not, on it’s own, risk contributing to Donald Trump’s second term.
The flip side of that nuance is that his rhetoric about the subject, without the additional context, may discourage voting in swing states, which could help Trump/Republicans in a much more significant way than just not voting for Harris in California.
His follow-up statements clarified his stance, including the quote I provided.
His behavior overall was messy, but that quote holds up nicely on its own.
Then none of my votes get counted.
It’s California. There’s an open primary, I happen to live in one of the few red parts and for one spot the top two vote getters in the primary were Republican.
They didn’t run unopposed, the opposition just all failed to get a consensus. CA’s system isn’t perfect, but realistically a Democrat doesn’t have a chance in this particular district, maybe the less evil Republican has a shot though.
US elections involve some compromise. Vote for your ideal candidate in the primary, but after that there’s generally only 2 people who have any shot at a given seat, and throwing away your vote in protest helps the worst candidates succeed. That’s why elections spend so much money on attack ads - they want you feeling discouraged.