I would but I don’t read articles. I have AI do it for me because they most likely wrote them.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
- 404found@lemmy.ziptoscience@lemmy.world•Study reveals why DNA damage from smoking and UV rays may cause cancer in some people but not othersEnglish122·7 days ago
- 404found@lemmy.ziptoscience@lemmy.world•Staggering 90% of biomedical papers now show signs of AI helpEnglish31·8 days ago
Trained AI can be pretty useful at writing. People just need to actually read and edit it.
I made a website about a sport I knew nothing about. I was using AI to write the articles. I would cross reference the information against other websites on that sport and edit my AI article to make it more natural. The end goal was affiliated marketing but I lost interest after a while. Anytime you see an article like “the 10 best…” “the best hacks for…” etc, the author most likely made the article like I was doing.
Fortunately Google has shot themselves in the foot because nobody can find anything of value with their search engine anymore. Googles AI has significantly decreased traffic to all websites as well.
- 404found@lemmy.ziptoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL Pop-Tarts are now lower quality than the old generic knock offsEnglish51·11 days ago
They are also ultra processed. They probably don’t really even have to wrap them in that fake foil wrap because they are gonna stay exactly the same without it.
Maybe someone needs a Mastodon sports feed and then to post those articles here consistently.